3 Cases When You Should Not Listen To Your Users & Customers - Netokracija CEE

3 Cases When You Should Not Listen To Your Users & Customers

My customer is the king – whatever she says, she is always right.

dont listen

You can see this phrase in most of today’s books on best business management practices. And it is inarguably a good piece of advice. But is it really true at all times? My post on solving customers’ problems started an interesting discussion that has exposed at least three instances, in which listening to your users or customers might not make sense.

Before we dig into them, it is important to note that these instances share the same cause: people lie. When asked, we lie about what kind of product features we would be likely to use or what kind of design would smoothen our experience with the product. As Gerald Zaltman of Harvard Business School wrote in his book How Customers Think:

The correlation between stated intent and actual behavior is usually low and negative.

Most of us don’t lie about stated intent on purpose; it seems that our mind simply has a hard time predicting what will make us happy or what kind of product we are likely to use. While this limitation has far reaching consequences in many aspects of our everyday lives, let’s focus on just three that are very relevant in early stages of building a product.

Designing your product: pay attention to what users do, not what they say

While conclusive evidence of such limits of our minds is available for decades, it is still shocking to see how many entrepreneurs rely on what their users say, as opposed to what they do, when it comes to product design. It is even more surprising given the fact that the digital world allows for an unprecedented amount of user tracking. Even spaghetti sauce is designed this way. There are too many tools for rapid prototyping out there to list them all, but I found this comparison quite helpful, although it is a bit dated.

Validating your product: only cash counts

The same limitation applies to product validation. You have only validated the assumption that your customer is willing to buy your product if her cash lands in your account. You have only validated the assumption that your user is willing to use your product if she is actually using it.

This is a very important point when it comes to fundraising as well. You are much more likely to receive a seed investment if you have at least created a pre order or future signup site, which clearly describes your future product and generates solid buzz. Even Central Europe has some great examples of pre-product validation: just look at Goldee’s site (it used to accept pre orders for its crowdfunding campaign).

Claiming something along the lines of “I already have XX customers lined up who said that they will buy/use my product as soon as it comes out “ without any data (ideally cash) to back it up equates to having 0 customers, 0 users and no proof of concept.

Big customers requiring custom features: the art of saying no

We have all been there: a potentially big customer says she will buy your product if you build X, Y and Z feature and integrate the whole product to her system. If such customer could boost your revenues by XX%, shouldn’t you move heaven and earth to sign her up?

This is a really tricky problem that rarely offers a straightforward answer. You are dealing with the same mind trick, only this time the only available data is your lead’s stated intent. She is telling you what she wants, but how can you know if that is really true? Especially now that you know that even she doesn’t know what she really wants? Steli Efti had a great presentation at Pioneers Festival last year dubbed You Gotta Be a Hustler (I recommend watching the whole thing, a lot of insights delivered in a very entertaining fashion), the 27th minute described the very same scenario. Steli refused to accommodate the lead’s demands for extra features and discounts and she ended up signing up anyways. I have also heard stories with the exactly opposite outcome: startup decided to do all this custom development, gave the lead a hefty discount and at the end the lead walked away from the contract anyways. Does that mean that you should say no every time an important lead asks you for some extra work? Certainly not.

In theory the decision should be simple. You have just a handful of variables to consider:

(a) the lifetime value of the lead if you build the extra features,

(b) probability that the lead would not walk away from contract if you build the extra features,

(c) revenue you think these features can generate from other customers,

(d) the cost of building the extra features including opportunity costs,

(y) lifetime value of this lead if you didn’t build those features (and she would buy the product anyway),

(z) probability that the lead would buy your product without the extra features.

Then you compare the alternative of building the extra features (A*B+C –D) versus not building them (Y*Z ). The one that scores higher is the alternative you should pursue.

The issue, of course, lies in the fact that you are not certain what values to assign to each variable. So you do what a startup CEO does every day: gather as much data as you can, make an educated guess and hope for the best.

Know the limitations of our minds

The point of the three examples above is not to put together a case-specific manual for customer-related decisions. The key take away should be the understanding of how our mind limits our (and our customers’) capacity to make accurate predictions about how we will behave at some point in the future.

The impact of these limits on customer behavior may seem huge, yet it is dwarfed in significance when compared to how they influence our everyday lives, including the ability to be happy or build meaningful personal relationships. But more on that some other day.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.



John Biggs at TechCrunch Balkans in Sofia: There is a Way Out of This Media Black Hole!

The first TechCrunch Balkans meetup in Sofia begun with a loud whistle from Dilyan Dimitrov, founder of the Bulgarian accelerator Eleven, the host of this event. It was startup time! That is right, TechCrunch Balkans, organized by Netocratic, is being held throughout this week – we will have lectures, panels and the most important thing – pitches in front of John Biggs!


Combine Technical And Marketing Knowledge Within Your Startup Team

You've probably heard about Bellabeat, FlyKly, or Layer? Well, three years ago they didn't exist! Now they are at the top of their industries, but how did they do it? Was it enough only to have the right idea or did they also need to have knowledge to conduct business in today’s competitive environment? Specifically, what kind of knowledge do startups need to succeed and not repeat the many mistakes of the 90% of startups that fail?


Slovenian ‘Booze’ Startup Flaviar Raises 400.000 $ from Speedinvest!

Slovene-British startup Flaviar announced today that it raised a seed round of 400k $ from American fund Speedinvest. This one year old company ships monthly tasting packs of 5 sample spirits (whisky, rum, gin, vodka, etc.) to their members, each month with a different theme.

What you missed


Croatian agencies SeekandHit and airt presented Capt’n: „It saves time and money just like top advertising experts!”

Veterans of advertising and co-founders of the leading agencies DRAP and SeekandHit presented their AI platform that optimizes advertising for Facebook and Google networks.


Croatian fintech startup airt helps banks learn about user’s transactions using AI

This week we had opportunity to cover the announcement of airtAI, a Croatian fintech startup whose solution is based on artificial intelligence and is directed towards smaller banks that want to better assess the needs of their clients. Exclusively for Netrokracija airt’s CEO Hajdi Ćenan reveals the details.


Cenosco: A Dutch company that prevents explosions on oil platforms from Pula, The Hague and Zagreb through software, VR and AR

Applications that control the operation of oil platforms and plants for the processing of derivatives are directly responsible for a safer and cleaner world, and one of the best is created largely in Croatia.


Blockchain from the Bloc(k): Listen to the 1st podcast dedicated to Balkan blockchain scene (by æternity and Netokracija)

We are delighted to present you Blockchain from the Bloc(k), the first podcast about Balkan's blockchain scene by Netokracija and æternity Ventures, asset management company investing in Blockchain startups.


We found out what’s happening in the Rimac Automobili office in Osijek

Rimac Automobili’s expansion is in full swing. After the opening of a development office in Split, a similar one has opened in Slavonia, or in Osijek’s Esseker center to be exact. To see the story behind the new office and the things being developed inside it, I’ve decided to simply – visit. My host was […]


6 Important Areas Often Overlooked by Product Leaders

Attending Product Management Festival 2017 (PMF 2017) in Zurich, Switzerland, and meeting amazing product professionals inspired me to go deeper into six important areas that are often neglected or entirely overlooked by product leaders.